<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unit testing with Commons HttpClient library</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.newsplore.com/2010/02/09/unit-testing-with-httpclient/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.newsplore.com/2010/02/09/unit-testing-with-httpclient</link>
	<description>Everything beta</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsplore.com/2010/02/09/unit-testing-with-httpclient/comment-page-1#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsplore.com/?p=1442#comment-933</guid>
		<description>Great approach to HttpClient mocks.   As an alternative to putting your HttpClient mock in package 
org.apache.commons.httpclient, you could use reflection to call HttpMethodBase.setResponseStream.If your project uses spring, ReflectionTestUtils.invokeSetterMethod will work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great approach to HttpClient mocks.   As an alternative to putting your HttpClient mock in package<br />
org.apache.commons.httpclient, you could use reflection to call HttpMethodBase.setResponseStream.If your project uses spring, ReflectionTestUtils.invokeSetterMethod will work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unit testing</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsplore.com/2010/02/09/unit-testing-with-httpclient/comment-page-1#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>Unit testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsplore.com/?p=1442#comment-754</guid>
		<description>Previously i had worked on the framework and now iam using the XAMPP 1.7.2 ,while working on the Framework i had good good hand as it as Unit testing allows various diversifications also like provides the mock services from the function documentations and now i followed your tutorial on the XAMPP but still i got trapped in the one of the hidden files..not able to resolve the issue till now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Previously i had worked on the framework and now iam using the XAMPP 1.7.2 ,while working on the Framework i had good good hand as it as Unit testing allows various diversifications also like provides the mock services from the function documentations and now i followed your tutorial on the XAMPP but still i got trapped in the one of the hidden files..not able to resolve the issue till now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unit testing with Commons HttpClient</title>
		<link>http://blog.newsplore.com/2010/02/09/unit-testing-with-httpclient/comment-page-1#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>Unit testing with Commons HttpClient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.newsplore.com/?p=1442#comment-695</guid>
		<description>[...] I am not the only one who has faced problems with this Http Client. In that article, Florin provides a good solution using a concrete subclass of HttpClient in order to mock it&#8216;s behaviour. His article was very useful in helping me formulate my approach. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am not the only one who has faced problems with this Http Client. In that article, Florin provides a good solution using a concrete subclass of HttpClient in order to mock it&#8216;s behaviour. His article was very useful in helping me formulate my approach. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

