As I’m using the ubiquitous Hibernate 3.3 as the JPA 1.0 provider for Spincloud, I decided to try out another one. I had tried OpenJPA (spawned from Kodo JDO) when they only supported build-time bytecode enhancement and it was a pain to make it work. It worked all right but boy what a pain. There’s now an agent to provide on-the-fly enhancement but I’ll take transparent enhancement anytime.
I’ve heard about EclipseLink before. The project started when Oracle donated the respectable TopLink project to the Eclipse foundation. If the solid reputation behind TopLink was a good enough argument for me to try it, the announcement that it will be the JPA 2.0 reference implementation convinced me that I should try it out.
My goal is to evaluate if EclipseLink is production-ready. I’m applying a complex set of evaluation criteria (joking): if it can run Spincloud then it is (I was inspired by Seifer’s interview on Infoq about Ruby VMs; when asked what was the criteria for qualifying if a Ruby VM is production ready, he answered: if it runs Rails).
I have the following JPA requirements:
– column mappings, one-to-one, one-to-many
– supports BLOB fields
– supports NamedQueries and NamedNativeQueries
– support for object cache and query cache
– deployment/operational nice to have: ease of maintaining compatibility with both EclipseLink and Hibernate in the source code and runtime. Ideally I should plug-in any JPA provider without changing a single line of code. This was not attainable as I’ll explain below.
I started by downloading the binaries. I’m using Maven to bring the jars so I’ve followed the instructions here. I only changed the version since I wanted to use v1.1.0:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.persistence</groupId>
<artifactId>eclipselink</artifactId>
<version>1.1.0</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
There’s a single jar file called eclipselink-1.1.0.jar downloaded which is a nice change from the multitude of Hibernate jars I was accustomed with.
Continue reading “Evaluating EclipseLink 1.1”